« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: UT3 Benchmark  (Read 3418 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Zeus

  • Community Leaders
  • Registered Forum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2065
  • Karma: +13/-2
    • View Profile
UT3 Benchmark
« on: May 16, 2009, 09:54:37 AM »
Its your hardware good enough for UT3

Its an my old thread at Titan but still handy to see if the lastest driver is faster or not



run Containment two runs then compare your results with the table below - Yet to see a Duel GPU do anything for UT3

Score-res-GFX-OS-CPU(GHz)-User
Also need some more High res results

Caution reading results - the AA can be overridden in the control panel and yet the benchmark still shows AAx16 will show the AAx? when it is given

1280x1024

196FPS - GTX260 -V32 - D3.7 Fliperaci (AAx2)
148FPS - GTX260 -V32 - D3.7 Fliperaci (AAx16)
143FPS - 8800GT -XP - Q3.4 - rhiridflaidd ( GPU OC'd, volt mod, water block)
143 FPS - 3870x2 -Win7- AMD Phenom x3, 3.46Ghz Sincreator
142FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D4.0 Zeus (GPU standard)patch2.1 with lastest GPU driver
139FPS - 9800GTX -XP- D3.6 Zeus (GPU OC'd - artifacts in UT3)
137FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D3.6 Zeus (GPU standard)
133FPS - 8800GT -XP - Q3.4 - rhiridflaidd - Checked
129FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D3.38 Zeus (GPU standard)
124FPS - 8800GTS -XP - Q3.4 - Scummm (SLI GPUs)
122FPS - 8800GTX -V32- Q3.36 - Cr4zyB4st4rd (GPU OC'd)
120FPS - 8800GT - XP - D3.0 - Alask (GPU OC'd)
118FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D3.0 Zeus (GPU standard)
117FPS - 8800Ultra-XP - D3.0 - Zofo (GPU standard)
116FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D3.0 - Zeus(GPU standard - mem strap at 333)
113FPS - 9800GTX - XP - Q3.0 - ThEGr33K (GPU STD)
111FPS - HD3870 - XP - D3.6 - ThEGr33K (Crossfire, OC'd)
110 FPS - GTX280 -V64- Q3.4 Senture
107FPS - HD3870 - XP - D3.6 - ThEGr33K (Crossfire)
100FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D2.3 Zeus (GPU standard)
100FPS - 9600GT - XP - D2.7 - PinkyRing
98FPS - HD3870 pair - XP - Q3.0 - ThEGr33K (GPU STD)
97FPS - 8800GTS - XP - Q2.4 - [FnG]pyxie.T32
95FPS - 8800GT, -XP - D3.0 - BattleMode
94FPS - HD3870 - XP - Q3.6 - ThEGr33K (single card)
91 FPS - 8800GTX -V64- 3.6 Zeus (GPU OC'd)
90FPS - 8800GTS - XP - 3.3 - Pariah
89 FPS - 9800GTX -V64 - 3.6 Zeus (GPU OC'd)
85 FPS - HD 3870 -V32 - D3.0 Camazza
82 FPS - HD 3870 -XP - D3.2 Arfa
75FPS - 8800GT -V32 - D2.3 - 2xnkoté
75FPS - 8800GTS -XP - Q2.4 - Pariah
60FPS - X1950XT- XP - Q3.0 - ThEGr33K
57FPS - X1950XT- XP - Q2.4 - ThEGr33K
52FPS - 8800GT -XP - AMDx2@2.2 - Alask.T32 (GPU OC'd)
49FPS - 9600GT -XP - AMDx2@2.0 - REtender
47FPS - 8600GT -V32 - 2.3 - 2xnkoté
46FPS - X1950 -XP - D2.7 - PinkyRing
42FPS - 7900GS -XP - AMDx2@3.2 - Kraut58

1680x1050

170FPS - GTX260 -V32 - D3.7 Fliperaci (AAx2)
141 FPS - 3870x2 -Win7- AMD Phenom x3, 3.46Ghz Sincreator
134FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D3.6 Zeus (GPU - OC'd artifacts in UT3)
124FPS - 8800GTS -XP - Q3.4 - Scummm (SLI GPUs)
123FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D4.0 Zeus (GPU standard) patch2.1 with lastest GPU driver
121FPS - GTX260 -V32 - D3.7 Fliperaci (AAx16)
119FPS - 8800GTX -V32 - Q3.36 - Cr4zyB4st4rd (GPU OC'd)
117FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D3.6 Zeus (GPU standard)
114FPS - GTX285 -XP - Q3.0 Loose Cannon
114FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D3.6 Zeus (GPU standard) - Steam install of UT3
112 FPS - GTX280 -V64- Q3.4 Senture
111FPS - 8800GT - XP - D3.0 - Alask (GPU OC'd)
103FPS - 8800GT - XP - D3.0 - Alask (GPU standard)
99FPS - HD4800 - V64 D4.0 - THe_Grey_Man
92FPS - HD3870 - XP - D3.6 - ThEGr33K (Crossfire)
92FPS - 8800GT - XP - D3.0 - BattleMode
84FPS - HD3870 - XP - D3.6 - ekyman
75FPS - HD3870 - XP - D3.0 - ekyman
71FPS -8800GTS - Vx64 -Q3.6 -Flak Dance.T32
28FPS - HD3870 - XP - AMDx2@2.2 - ekyman

1920×1080

136 FPS - 3870x2 -Win7- AMD Phenom x3, 3.46Ghz Sincreator

1920x1200

113 FPS - GTX280 -V64- Q3.4 Senture (Hardware Physics: Enabled)
111 FPS - GTX280 -V64- Q3.4 Senture
110FPS - GTX285 -XP - Q3.0 Loose Cannon
107FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D3.6 Zeus (GPU - OC'dartifacts in UT3)
98FPS - 8800GTX - Vx32 - Q3.36 - Cr4zyB4st4rd (GPU OC'd)
98FPS - HD4800 - V64 D4.0 - THe_Grey_Man
95FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D3.6 Zeus (GPU standard)
95FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D3.38 Zeus (GPU standard)
93FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D3.0 Zeus (GPU standard)
90FPS - 9800GTX -XP - D2.3 Zeus (GPU standard)
88FPS - 8800GTX -V64 - D3.6 Zeus (GPU OC'd)
85FPS - 9800GTX -V64 - D3.6 Zeus (GPU OC'd)
83FPS - 9800GTX -V64 - D3.6 Zeus (GPU standard)
82FPS - 8800GT -XP - D3.0 - BattleMode
66FPS -8800GTS - Vx64 -Q3.6 -Flak Dance.T32



Index D= Intel dual, Q =Intel Quad

download here once installed update it to the latest version for patch 2.1

to register the HOC program use this link here
« Last Edit: November 17, 2009, 17:35:57 PM by Zeus »
Logged

Zeus

  • Community Leaders
  • Registered Forum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2065
  • Karma: +13/-2
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2009, 09:57:36 AM »
Quote
The benchmark started at 16/05/2009 09:28:33

System Information
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP
System memory: 2046 MB
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8600 @ 3.33GHz
CPU speed: 4000 MHz
Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ - 512 MB
Benchmark Information
Benchmark type: Flyby
Demo: vCTF-Containment
Motion Blur: Disabled
Hardware Physics: Disabled
Anisotropic filtering: 16×

Resolution: 1680 × 1050 (Custom)
Score = 123 FPS

Logged

Zeus

  • Community Leaders
  • Registered Forum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2065
  • Karma: +13/-2
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2009, 10:05:50 AM »
Quote
The benchmark started at 16/05/2009 09:57:53

System Information
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP
System memory: 2046 MB
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8600 @ 3.33GHz
CPU speed: 3990 MHz
Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ - 512 MB
Benchmark Information
Benchmark type: Flyby
Demo: vCTF-Containment
Motion Blur: Disabled
Hardware Physics: Disabled
Anisotropic filtering: 16×

Resolution: 1280×1024
Score = 142 FPS
Logged

Zofo

  • Community Leaders
  • Registered Forum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3037
  • Karma: +41/-7
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2009, 12:47:48 PM »
Doesn't this mess with your UT3?
Logged

SleepEZ

  • Registered Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • Someone nicked me shocks
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2009, 12:52:39 PM »
I tried to bench my system the other day for shits and giggles, but UT3 kept crashing :/
Logged

Zeus

  • Community Leaders
  • Registered Forum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2065
  • Karma: +13/-2
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2009, 13:07:03 PM »
Quote from: "SleepEZ"
I tried to bench my system the other day for shits and giggles, but UT3 kept crashing :/

So did mine when the latest Nvidia driver came out - but the benchmark has been updated (mine did this morning) and now supports patch2.1, it should auto update when it starts (well it prompts you!)
Logged

Zeus

  • Community Leaders
  • Registered Forum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2065
  • Karma: +13/-2
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2009, 13:08:00 PM »
Quote from: "Zofo"
Doesn't this mess with your UT3?

well it didn't mess with my UT3 steam setup  ;)
Logged

SleepEZ

  • Registered Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • Someone nicked me shocks
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2009, 15:13:03 PM »
Quote from: "Zeus"
Quote from: "SleepEZ"
I tried to bench my system the other day for shits and giggles, but UT3 kept crashing :/

So did mine when the latest Nvidia driver came out - but the benchmark has been updated (mine did this morning) and now supports patch2.1, it should auto update when it starts (well it prompts you!)

Ahh might be that then, will try again later
Logged

SleepEZ

  • Registered Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • Someone nicked me shocks
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2009, 14:55:15 PM »
The old PC (which i was using to play UT3 with not too long ago)
Quote
System Information
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP
System memory: 1023 MB
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.00GHz
CPU speed: 2500 MHz
Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT - 128 MB
Benchmark Information
Benchmark type: Flyby
Demo: vCTF-Containment
Motion Blur: Disabled
Hardware Physics: Disabled
Anisotropic filtering: 16×

Resolution: 1280×1024
Score = 10 FPS
Score = 10 FPS
Average score = 10 FPS

Resolution: 1440 × 900 (Custom)
Score = 10 FPS
Score = 10 FPS
Average score = 10 FPS

Does i win?
Logged

azurescorch

  • Registered Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 266
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2009, 16:28:40 PM »
WE HAS A WINrar!
10fps, ouch.

Now SleepEz has a new machine, does this mean I'm now the one with the lowest frame rate?
35fps at 800x, 20fps at 1024x
(and yes I play at 800x  :x )
Logged

Scummm

  • Game Server Admins
  • Registered Forum Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #10 on: June 06, 2009, 02:30:08 AM »
The benchmark started at 06/06/2009 02:22:55

System Information
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP
System memory: 3070 MB
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
CPU speed: 3380 MHz
Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 - 512 MB
Benchmark Information
Benchmark type: Flyby
Demo: vCTF-Corruption
Motion Blur: Enabled
Hardware Physics: Disabled
Anisotropic filtering: 16×



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 1280×1024
Score = 185 FPS
Score = 183 FPS
Average score = 184 FPS


just thought i would try this fir a larffff  :D
Logged

Scummm

  • Game Server Admins
  • Registered Forum Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #11 on: June 06, 2009, 02:36:56 AM »
heres 1 i did @ 1680 × 1050


The benchmark started at 06/06/2009 02:30:54

System Information
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP
System memory: 3070 MB
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
CPU speed: 3390 MHz
Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 - 512 MB
Benchmark Information
Benchmark type: Flyby
Demo: vCTF-Corruption
Motion Blur: Enabled
Hardware Physics: Disabled
Anisotropic filtering: 16×



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 1680 × 1050 (Custom)
Score = 176 FPS
Score = 176 FPS
Average score = 176 FPS
Logged

Zeus

  • Community Leaders
  • Registered Forum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2065
  • Karma: +13/-2
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2009, 11:17:47 AM »
Quote from: "Scummm"
heres 1 i did @ 1680 × 1050


The benchmark started at 06/06/2009 02:30:54

System Information
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP
System memory: 3070 MB
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
CPU speed: 3390 MHz
Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 - 512 MB
Benchmark Information
Benchmark type: Flyby
Demo: vCTF-Corruption
Motion Blur: Enabled
Hardware Physics: Disabled
Anisotropic filtering: 16×



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 1680 × 1050 (Custom)
Score = 176 FPS
Score = 176 FPS
Average score = 176 FPS

Very impressive result  :o could you run it again with vCTF-Containment as thats what map we used for all the comparisons.

Do you have the GPU mega clocked with liquid nitrogen ? as those results really do stand out for a single GeForce 8800 GTS 512

Could do with getting 'Frymaster' to run this benchie with his i7 and duel GPU setup
Logged

Scummm

  • Game Server Admins
  • Registered Forum Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #13 on: June 07, 2009, 10:13:46 AM »
lol m8 gfx cards are in sli mode forgot to include that .
thats why my fps might be a wee bit higer than expected
 :D
Logged

Zeus

  • Community Leaders
  • Registered Forum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2065
  • Karma: +13/-2
    • View Profile
Re: UT3 Benchmark
« Reply #14 on: June 07, 2009, 10:30:05 AM »
Quote from: "Scummm"
lol m8 gfx cards are in sli mode forgot to include that .
thats why my fps might be a wee bit higer than expected
 :D

well that explains the great result  :D
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »