BFBC2 better K:D ratio with low settings

[Zeus]

First a apologize for my obsession with 120FPS - but thats the way  the mop flops 

Well I've just upgraded my rig and before I use to play on low settings to try a achieve 120FPS but failed with both of my GPU (GTX295) core at 15% load but got at 80 -90 FPS on low

But since upgraded to an i5 I can play on medium 110FPS or high settings 90 FPS, the eye candy is great but I have noticed my kill rate drop.

came across this Can People Really See More On Low Settings? and lot of what some users was saying made sense about the differance in low/med/high settings.

Just gone back to Low settings and I'm killing more again.

Basically you see much more - like folk 'thinking their hiding'    Spot kill works much better

Its your call

[ZenTiX]

You also don't get the sandstorm/snowstorms through the maps (:
But the terrain can be a bit dodgy when you go to extreme ranges. Like you san CLEARLY see the sniper, but you can't kill him, cause he's actually behind a hill.

[Zeus]

been there with three players I could see but not spot or kill on another map- shame really when the lower setting gives the edge

[Zofo]

meh, I would rather my graphics

[LooseCannon]

This is like UT2k4, turning of the foliage?  Players might squat down in tall grass and think they were hidden.

[Peacekeeper]

this worked for me in dozens of games, even tf2 is a bit easier with lowest graphics - i dont know why, but it works.

same for nearly all battlefield titles (better with low, but sniper gets worse on a distance), good old vietcong 1 and 2 (turning off jungle makes charlie naked) and a few other games